Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 00:56:44 +0000 From: George Cox <gjvc@extremis.demon.co.uk> To: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> Cc: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.0-release (ports) schedule Message-ID: <20000125005644.A221@extremis.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20000124205021.B24975@cichlids.cichlids.com>; from alex@big.endian.de on Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 08:50:21PM %2B0100 References: <200001241436.GAA23651@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <20000124103710.B75151@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000124205021.B24975@cichlids.cichlids.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24/01 20:50, Alexander Langer wrote:
> Just FYI, maybe you can do something against this strict handling.
> Or not, I don't know. Somehow, it's very good that the compiler does
> this...
Ports with such sloppy code should be patched as part of the port process,
or better, have the original authors ass WHUPPED and have them be taught
the virtues of using the compiler flags
'-Wall -Wa-few-other-things-documented-in-the-man-page'
on _every_ _source_ _file_ _they_ _compile_.
End rant.
gjvc
--
[gjvc]
In god we're trussed
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000125005644.A221>