Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 7 Jun 2003 00:46:16 -0400
From:      Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>, bmah@freebsd.org
Cc:        freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Way forward with BIND 8
Message-ID:  <p05210609bb071a213208@[128.113.24.47]>
In-Reply-To: <20030606.132404.126768734.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <20030606175954.GQ65470@perrin.int.nxad.com> <3EE0DBEC.F32AF559@pipeline.ch> <200306061829.h56IT59c048678@bmah.dyndns.org> <20030606.132404.126768734.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 1:24 PM -0600 6/6/03, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>In message: <200306061829.h56IT59c048678@bmah.dyndns.org>
>             "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org> writes:
>: If memory serves me right, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>:
>: >  -CURRENT and 5.1R remove BIND8 from contrib. User
>: >  will have to install from ports whatever pleases
>: >  him/her (bind8.3, bind8.4, bind9, djbdns, maradns, ...).
>: >
>: >  -CURRENT and 5.1R import BIND9 Resolver (IPv6 aware
>: >  if you wish).
>:
>: It is way too late to make changes of this sort for
>: 5.1-RELEASE.
>
>s/of this sort/of any sort/g
>
>Warner

I would like to suggest that it is too late for any more
particularly disruptive changes in 5.x.  We'll soon have
5.1-release out the door, and I think we should really
concentrate on having the 6.0-current branch happen after
5.2-release is done.  We can not keep adding "just one more
major change", or 5.x will never become freebsd-stable.

It would be pretty painful if we come to 5.2-release, and
find that we can't make the 6.0 branch until after 5.3.  I
would rather live with bind8 in 5.x-stable, than delay the
6.0 branch another four or five months.  If we were to make
this change, we first have to take the time to implement it,
and then we would have to "let it sit" for at least a month
or two before we would be comfortable calling it "stable"
for the wide variety of users that we have.  The benefit is
not worth the delay, IMO.

I think the project needs to avoid introducing any more
disruptive changes in this branch.

Just my 2 cents...

-- 
Garance Alistair Drosehn            =   gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer           or  gad@freebsd.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute    or  drosih@rpi.edu



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p05210609bb071a213208>