Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 9 Sep 1995 22:53:40 -0600
From:      Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net>
To:        davidg@Root.COM
Cc:        Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net>, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: GUS Max support in -stable? 
Message-ID:  <199509100453.WAA29003@rocky.sri.MT.net>
In-Reply-To: <199509100151.SAA00714@corbin.Root.COM>
References:  <199509100136.TAA28763@rocky.sri.MT.net> <199509100151.SAA00714@corbin.Root.COM>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >This is strange.  This sounds rather naive, but how does config know
> >which include files to generate?  It no longer generates 'gusmax.h', and
> >I'm not sure how it determines which include files to generate.
> 
>    It's based on the "files" file. Each 'optional' will cause a .h file
> to be generated. There are two "files" files - /sys/conf/files and
> /sys/i386/conf/files.i386.

I thought so, but I didn't see any mention of gusmax in any of the
files, and my 2.0.5 box is off-line now I couldn't verify it.

Hopefully we'll get this figured out before 2.1 releases. ;)


Nate



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509100453.WAA29003>