Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 11:36:29 +0200 From: Ed Schouten <ed@nuxi.nl> To: "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@com.bat.ru> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, Alan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org>, Michal Mertl <mime@traveller.cz> Subject: Re: Odd w/who behavior for the last 12 years Message-ID: <CABh_MKkEHc3Q25iT3vcEfa80E0-5WOu-zGLO%2BHQZ0z-F3SFcyg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CALdFvJGXKAKRoNMcuSHcXLz8_Ph59mEHYcc4TXJTA6tZ59CzDw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CALdFvJGXKAKRoNMcuSHcXLz8_Ph59mEHYcc4TXJTA6tZ59CzDw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Timur, 2018-05-28 5:26 GMT+02:00 Timur I. Bakeyev <timur@com.bat.ru>: > So I propose to remove the said patch(or make it verify only "pts/" > devices). any objections? Sounds good! Changes like the ones made in r155875 were simply workarounds to deal with processes silly enough not to write DEAD_PROCESS entries. Instead of patching up w, wall, who, etc. we should spend effort to fix these problems at the root instead. Be sure to cc me on code reviews! -- Ed Schouten <ed@nuxi.nl> Nuxi, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CABh_MKkEHc3Q25iT3vcEfa80E0-5WOu-zGLO%2BHQZ0z-F3SFcyg>