Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:50:08 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> To: Bruce Simpson <bms@incunabulum.net> Cc: Bruce M Simpson <bms@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, QAT@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print Makefile ports/print/openprinting Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-message ports/print/openprinting/files patch-freebsd Message-ID: <20100210075008.1d1fd87d@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <4B707F9D.80807@incunabulum.net> References: <201002081940.o18JeO6t065676@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100208230225.57518342@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <4B707F9D.80807@incunabulum.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:18:21 +0000 Bruce Simpson <bms@incunabulum.net> wrote: > Not MAKE_JOBS_SAFE ? > > I haven't seen this on either box I built it on (8.0-STABLE/amd64, > 8.0-RELEASE/i386). > > Is the ccache support in the ports tiny invasive in any way? This > package is mostly Sun code and it does use its own link maps as you > can see. My current view about ccache is that it works perfectly in 99.9% cases and fails in strange way in the rest. It might be ... I'll try it without when I'll have QAT idleing (which won't happen very soon). -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAktySREACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeUnSACgh+0Du6AIjfbyVZZufCcklwss bNwAn1wnZaP/d34arPGpdWollaV4utiD =BtSg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100210075008.1d1fd87d>