Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1995 19:02:20 +0300 (EET DST) From: "Andrew V. Stesin" <stesin@elvisti.kiev.ua> To: roberto@keltia.Freenix.FR (Ollivier Robert) Cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Kerberized 'syslog' (was: Do we really need logger(1)? Message-ID: <199509101602.TAA11404@office.elvisti.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <199509101329.PAA19339@keltia.Freenix.FR> from "Ollivier Robert" at Sep 10, 95 03:29:14 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dear Ollivier, # It seems that Andrew V. Stesin said: # > Agreed, 100 hundred times agreed. This is The Best Solution (tm) # > because of many issues, like interoperability, design, etc... # > But: where is FreeBSD Kerberos port for us to use, for example, # > in Europe? # # Take the crypto stuff in South Africa (from the FAQ: # # South Africa # skeleton.mikom.csir.co.za:/pub/FreeBSD # # storm.sea.uct.ac.za:/pub/FreeBSD # # it has all the eBones stuff. Alas it is Kerbv4 no eBones for Kerbv5 # :-( # AFAIK this stuff now is in process of integration into the tree, and the legal situation is far of a crystal clearness as well. Please, correct me if I'm wrong. And still no answer: any fault-tolerance features in Kerberized syslod yet? # -- # Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.frmug.fr.net # FreeBSD keltia.Freenix.FR 2.2-CURRENT #0: Sat Sep 9 17:49:09 MET DST 1995 # -- With best regards -- Andrew Stesin. +380 (44) 2760188 +380 (44) 2713457 +380 (44) 2713560
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509101602.TAA11404>