Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 10:08:20 -0700 (MST) From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: mmercer@ipass.net Cc: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru>, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problem with appletviewer in jdk1.2.2b10 Message-ID: <200010291708.KAA04295@nomad.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <39FC3AA1.FA3ED9DC@ipass.net> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010291248090.31940-100000@iclub.nsu.ru> <39FC3AA1.FA3ED9DC@ipass.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I understood your answer to the question : is it supposed to be so or > not? (yes) to mean it is supposed to be built. With that in context, > my question, will it be corrected any time soon? is asking will the > build be corrected to compile the shared library of gcc. libgcc is *NOT* supposed to be built shared. However, as you point out, the binaries created by gcc are dependant upon these routines, so they should be linked into the final executable. IMO, the problem is in the linker not pulling these routines into the 'driver' binaries, but I don't know how to fix that. In short, this isn't a JDK problem per-se, but a build-tool problem. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200010291708.KAA04295>