Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 23:03:52 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: small bsd.prog.mk change Message-ID: <20030110224932.A20648-100000@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <xzpd6n6h51s.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> writes:
> > Seomthing like this has been tried before, but apparently not finished.
> > See revs.1.109-1.110. The above has a smaller scope than rev.1.109 so
> > I think it doesn't have the problems of rev.1.109, but it leaves
> > revs.1-109-1.110 unfinished and creates a style bug by not removing
> > vestiges of rev.1.110. To fix the style bug, back out revs.1.109-1.110
> > before adding the ifdef as above, so that there is only 1 copy of the
> > rule.
>
> How's this?
[Context lost to attachment]
OK with me.
Also consider zapping the _EXTRADEPEND rule. It only works with the
default rule for ${PROG}. In boot/i386/loader, this currently just
gives a bogus dependency on ${LIBC}.
Bruce
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030110224932.A20648-100000>