Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:28:44 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFT] Update OpenJDK6 to b23 Message-ID: <4E1B089C.90001@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201107081729.46242.jkim@FreeBSD.org> References: <201107072002.16059.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4E16D92C.5000508@FreeBSD.org> <201107081623.50665.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <201107081729.46242.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 09/07/2011 00:29 Jung-uk Kim said the following: > On Friday 08 July 2011 04:23 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> On Friday 08 July 2011 06:17 am, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> on 08/07/2011 03:02 Jung-uk Kim said the following: >>>> I have a patch to update java/openjdk6 to b23: >>>> >>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/openjdk6-b23.diff >>>> >>>> Please test and report any regression. >>> >>> Can this update be used as a chance to spin off icedtea web >>> plugin into a separate port? >> >> I was going to do it separately but I think it's clearer. >> >> IcedTea-Web 1.1 port: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/icedtea-web-ports.tar.gz >> >> (Updated) java/openjdk6 patch: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/openjdk6-b23_1.diff > > BTW, I have alternative port/patch: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/icedtea-web-ports_1.tar.gz > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/openjdk6-b23_2.diff > > Basically, the IcedTea patch for IcedTea-Web is controlled by ICEDTEA > option and it is turned on by default. > > I am not sure which is better. :-/ Thanks a lot for doing all of this! I slightly prefer the second approach, but it is your call :) -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E1B089C.90001>