Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 06:30:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/37943: [PATCH] minor corrections for cutting-edge Message-ID: <200205111330.g4BDU3o82143@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/37943; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org> To: Martin Heinen <martin@sumuk.de> Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/37943: [PATCH] minor corrections for cutting-edge Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 16:01:46 +0300 On 2002-05-11 13:09, Martin Heinen wrote: > > This is also touched by patches of another PR I was reading. One > > submitted by Greg Shapiro. If someone commits this one or the diff I > > sent in the audit trail of that PR a little merging work will be > > necessary for this part ;) > > As Greg noted, this section needs some work. Therefore we can drop > my suggestions and use PR 36773 instead. If Greg says 'aye' to that other patch, I'll do the merge of the two :> > > > - Pentium 3 with 128 MB of RAM takes about 2 hours to build > > > + Pentium III with 128 MB of RAM takes about 2 hours to build > > > > Is this really necessary? I'm not saying it's wrong or something. > > But is III the way these processors should be referred to in written > > text? > > I compared with Intels Website: > > http://www.intel.com/products/browse/processor.htm?iid=ipp_nav+browse_proc&; I guess it's settled then. If Intel calls it a Pentium III, this is what we should call it too, IMHO. - Giorgos To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200205111330.g4BDU3o82143>