Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:57:10 -0700 From: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> To: "Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya)" <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> Cc: Ngie Cooper <ngie@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r322951 - head Message-ID: <34af7231-29ff-5ebe-44d1-0a7ae0dea235@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <F3AFC002-3BA9-4EA5-9347-6FC66DCB7EF8@gmail.com> References: <201708271615.v7RGFcKs033967@repo.freebsd.org> <b698f201-5ca9-1662-8d61-ccacf3693002@FreeBSD.org> <F3AFC002-3BA9-4EA5-9347-6FC66DCB7EF8@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --6X0UANm7l0OUS0U2mC2ftqR4H2e2FPehs Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="XrhXVkibhNwKBAIQLLAal3wFKaJdAIGoK"; protected-headers="v1" From: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> To: "Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya)" <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> Cc: Ngie Cooper <ngie@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Message-ID: <34af7231-29ff-5ebe-44d1-0a7ae0dea235@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r322951 - head References: <201708271615.v7RGFcKs033967@repo.freebsd.org> <b698f201-5ca9-1662-8d61-ccacf3693002@FreeBSD.org> <F3AFC002-3BA9-4EA5-9347-6FC66DCB7EF8@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <F3AFC002-3BA9-4EA5-9347-6FC66DCB7EF8@gmail.com> --XrhXVkibhNwKBAIQLLAal3wFKaJdAIGoK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/30/17 1:44 AM, Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya) wrote: >=20 >> On Oct 25, 2017, at 13:34, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> wrote:= >=20 > =E2=80=A6 >=20 >> I don't understand what you're saying here. If I build with MK_TCSH=3D= yes >> and the host does not have tcsh, a failure occurs AFTER or BEFORE this= >> change? >> Neither case makes sense to me. >> What is the failure? >> >> The change here is to build-tools which just calls 'make build-tools' = in >> bin/csh which just builds 'gethost'. >=20 > Yes. The relnotes concerns I mentioned are bogus. >=20 > Yeah, a ~400 line C file isn=E2=80=99t that bad, I agree. >=20 > I really don=E2=80=99t care about arguing this or debating it. Yes, you= =E2=80=99re right on all counts. It=E2=80=99s a micro optimization. I wasn't trying to argue or anything, just trying to understand if there was a big issue here. Thanks! >=20 --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --XrhXVkibhNwKBAIQLLAal3wFKaJdAIGoK-- --6X0UANm7l0OUS0U2mC2ftqR4H2e2FPehs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEE+Rc8ssOq6npcih8JNddxu25Gl88FAln3S9gACgkQNddxu25G l89uqQgAnZsdszqHGmfjv7IiN3IbeNB0QYtfbs3hPhKXmtxvaM0dc1WvX0Ch3FtN 0ECaKc/Z8dzcRX/Q6wZ/SK2SE++oRd6TEVqgQeeZxiRkUt3agN242eKBfJvAvPlM jfqgxd8IG7NfAtQFCy8+KwHEeF2Th2seIxwatSTBSSmRPd3HtdC/NHmagM9nb7bU +WlJ9Nj/8lEkDE5SguU8fi+beEmzg0WHlDmPPDH818T2OFMPJu0TSgHs1ApKnhfP KulZvWlQTQPR9VHgtqbJeL17egNY4RFSEsyDqm7BVC9znNTOWWbkTbyKMVrc2Czt NTub5X8F2twtX7xD6kbpQ+7urjUD2Q== =V/3U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6X0UANm7l0OUS0U2mC2ftqR4H2e2FPehs--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?34af7231-29ff-5ebe-44d1-0a7ae0dea235>