Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 14:37:54 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS DOWN Message-ID: <46485822.7080000@fer.hr> In-Reply-To: <20070514132901.X24765@fledge.watson.org> References: <20070512153532.GQ21795@elvis.mu.org> <63984.1178992555@critter.freebsd.dk> <f25m78$ik$2@sea.gmane.org> <20070513215442.GZ21795@elvis.mu.org> <46478C9A.9050807@fer.hr> <20070514132901.X24765@fledge.watson.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Robert Watson wrote: > Actually, competitive MySQL benchmarking against Linux seems to > illustrate that jemalloc is dramatically more scalable than the native > glibc malloc, and comparable with the google malloc. Did NetCraft confirm it? :) (i.e. it's still a long time until someone from "the other camp" can install a shiny new 7.0-RELEASE and test it :) ) [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGSFgvldnAQVacBcgRAl7yAKDm5xpoayv2DwDMecaZiLhN5CI1cACgolNz KT7BwaG/a9Xovw1RDscbo+k= =Nv4k -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46485822.7080000>