Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:41:09 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Patrick M. Hausen" <hausen@punkt.de> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: NFS locking question Message-ID: <20060228144109.GA72408@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060228110251.GD47953@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> References: <20060228101453.GB47953@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <20060228102150.GA56625@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060228110251.GD47953@hugo10.ka.punkt.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 12:02:51PM +0100, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> Hi, Kris!
>=20
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:21:50AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>=20
> > Try the attached patch on the 6.0 machines:
>=20
> Thanks. Will do.
>=20
> But:
>=20
> > Index: usr.sbin/rpc.lockd/lock_proc.c
> > ...
>=20
> So, rpc.lockd _is_ needed on the client?
Yes. If you weren't doing that, do that instead.
> What about the statement in rc.conf(5) then, claiming it was
> only started on servers?
I only see this (correct) statement in that manpage:
rpc_lockd_enable
(bool) If set to ``YES'' and also an NFS server or client,
run rpc.lockd(8) at boot time.
Kris
--fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFEBGEEWry0BWjoQKURAjGoAJ9rE3yWqsNwDB2oAraV1/+GXdxFZgCeJC8F
YdGPmzWIHh/Qt3xyxUXD3ec=
=A72+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060228144109.GA72408>