Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 16:25:46 -0700 (MST) From: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com> To: kris@FreeBSD.ORG (Kris Kennaway) Cc: noor@comrax.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Latest RELENG_4. Message-ID: <200007172325.QAA16817@freeway.dcfinc.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007161522510.89152-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> from Kris Kennaway at "Jul 16, 0 03:24:56 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As I recall, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Chad R. Larson wrote: > >> As I recall, noor@comrax.com wrote: >>> What is the latest FreeBSD-STABLE release, and is it stable enough >>> for a productional system? >> >> Please remember that "STABLE" refers to the stability of the source >> tree, not of the resulting running system. That is, you should not >> see developmental work going on in -STABLE. > > Well, I claim this to be false: the targetted stability *is* of the > resulting product. Of course, we sometimes make mistakes - but if you > have *any* stability problems you should tell us!! Note that I didn't claim the -STABLE systems weren't stable. I just said that the original questioner seemed to have misunderstood the meaning of the tag. -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.net DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007172325.QAA16817>