Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Jul 2000 16:25:46 -0700 (MST)
From:      "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com>
To:        kris@FreeBSD.ORG (Kris Kennaway)
Cc:        noor@comrax.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Latest RELENG_4.
Message-ID:  <200007172325.QAA16817@freeway.dcfinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007161522510.89152-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> from Kris Kennaway at "Jul 16, 0 03:24:56 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As I recall, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Chad R. Larson wrote:
> 
>> As I recall, noor@comrax.com wrote:
>>> What is the latest FreeBSD-STABLE release, and is it stable enough
>>> for a productional system?
>> 
>> Please remember that "STABLE" refers to the stability of the source
>> tree, not of the resulting running system.  That is, you should not
>> see developmental work going on in -STABLE.
> 
> Well, I claim this to be false: the targetted stability *is* of the
> resulting product.  Of course, we sometimes make mistakes - but if you
> have *any* stability problems you should tell us!!

Note that I didn't claim the -STABLE systems weren't stable.  I just
said that the original questioner seemed to have misunderstood the
meaning of the tag.

	-crl
--
Chad R. Larson (CRL15)   602-953-1392   Brother, can you paradigm?
chad@dcfinc.com         chad@larsons.org          larson1@home.net   
DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007172325.QAA16817>