Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:42:30 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Adam McDougall <mcdouga9@egr.msu.edu> Cc: Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Mohan Srinivasan <mohan_srinivasan@yahoo.com>, mohans@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: link() not increasing link count on NFS server Message-ID: <20071119124156.G59049@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20071117162620.GR46369@egr.msu.edu> References: <698405.85667.qm@web31809.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20071116143239.U10677@fledge.watson.org> <20071116164549.GF37473@egr.msu.edu> <20071117162620.GR46369@egr.msu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, Adam McDougall wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:45:49AM -0500, Adam McDougall wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 02:37:56PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote: > > OK, I've attached an initial patch that does this -- we still need to > keep > the lookup code for NFSv2, where the file handle of the new node isn't > returned with the reply, but I drop the EEXIST handling cases. Does this > look reasonable to you? I'm not set up to easily test this scenario, > however. > > Robert N M Watson > > I should be able to test this patch (or a later version) this weekend. > > Seems to work. I ran the original test case for several minutes without > error for over 2000 iterations. I only tested it on -stable by applying the > patch manually. If it is required I test it verbatim on 7, let me know and > I will. Thanks. This sounds good, I will go ahead and merge it to HEAD, then start on the MFC cycle. Thanks, Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071119124156.G59049>