Date: Sat, 4 Apr 1998 00:04:25 +0400 From: =?koi8-r?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: "Alok K. Dhir" <adhir@worldbank.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, adkin003@tc.umn.edu Subject: Re: Working patch *with* splhigh() (Was Re: More info RE: X slowdown in -current) Message-ID: <19980404000425.64904@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <3267.891633132@critter.freebsd.dk>; from phk@critter.freebsd.dk on Fri, Apr 03, 1998 at 09:52:12PM %2B0200 References: <19980403233242.31917@nagual.pp.ru> <3267.891633132@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 03, 1998 at 09:52:12PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > My xserver is remote, but it still doesn't make any difference :-( local xserver needed for testing. > >> Does "systat :vm" show abnormally many syscalls ? How many is 'abnormally many'? Maybe I'll send you just systat output so you can determine? > The problem is that time must somehow become zero when we reach > tsleep() where it should have been non-zero. I'd be damned if I > can see how that can happen. Do you know any place for debugging printf which just detect error and not overflow messages? I can insert it there and test. Or maybe temporarily use some sysctl variable... > Anybody else see this problem with version 1.35 ? This whole thread *is* about 1.35 version, if you start to read from first messages they are 'the code claimed to be fixed but I still got slowness'. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/ MTH/SH/HE S-- W-- N+ PEC>+ D A a++ C G>+ QH+(++) 666+>++ Y To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980404000425.64904>