Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 15:45:31 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SysctlFS Message-ID: <200007142145.PAA39245@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 14 Jul 2000 12:48:05 %2B0200." <20000714124805.F17372@ywing.creative.net.au> References: <20000714124805.F17372@ywing.creative.net.au> <Pine.BSF.4.20.0007121328020.49102-100000@mx.webgiro.com> <20000712144510.A11316@ywing.creative.net.au> <200007130537.WAA29614@apollo.backplane.com> <20000714112117.D17372@ywing.creative.net.au> <xzppuohggib.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20000714053540.A30847@holly.calldei.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
In message <20000714124805.F17372@ywing.creative.net.au> Adrian Chadd writes: : As I said in my previous email, persistence isn't the primary problem : in my eyes. There are many ways people can handle it. What I see as being : an interesting problem is handling devfs across multiple process/group : namespaces (jail/chroot) without cluttering up your mount table. Yes. Another issue is the new hot plug devices. It is highly desirable to allow arbitrary commands to run when they come and go. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the messagehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007142145.PAA39245>