Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 17:09:04 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Feldman <green@unixhelp.org> To: Phillip Salzman <psalzman@gamefish.pcola.gulf.net> Cc: gmarco@giovannelli.it, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: wanton Atticizing is bad Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9812281708020.1243-100000@janus.syracuse.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9812281601360.13575-100000@gamefish.pcola.gulf.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 28 Dec 1998, Phillip Salzman wrote: > > > > You can do that with natd. > > That is possible, but not logical. Say you have 2000 > dialup users attempting to access the web at the same time... all > coming from different IP addresses -- would you want the packet > scanning to go at the Cisco, or at the NATd? Its simple to do > a transparent proxy from the cisco, and does not require too much on > the squid side (IPFILTER), with less on the router. I meant that natd could be used along with squid and ipfw divert, handling the packet translation and forwarding/reception. > > -- > Phillip Salzman > Brian Feldman _ __ ___ ___ ___ green@unixhelp.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \ http://www.freebsd.org/ _ __ ___ ____ | _ \__ \ |) | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ ___ ____ _____ |___/___/___/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9812281708020.1243-100000>