Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 20:22:32 -0500 From: Larry Sica <lomion@mac.com> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Magnus_B=E4ckstr=F6m?= <b@etek.chalmers.se> Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: dillon@'s commit bit: I object Message-ID: <4D146278-38A8-11D7-9713-000393A335A2@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0302050028080.82664-100000@scrooge.etek.chalmers.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 06:28 PM, Magnus B=E4ckstr=F6m wrote: > On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Brett Glass wrote: >> At 12:02 PM 2/4/2003, Larry Sica wrote: >>> I do not have the expertise to do any hard core programming, does=20 >>> that >>> mean i therefore should have no say? What if i write a number of >>> articles, or am really helpful? Or maintain hundreds of freebsd >>> systems? Does my investment seem less just because I am not a >>> committer? >> >> Exactly. Perhaps a better form of governance would include another >> (more open and democratic) stratum at the top, which in turn managed >> teams that did the coding, docs, advocacy, PR, system administration, >> etc.? > > Sketch a structure you believe would work in practice. > That is exactly what i am trying to think about now. I don't believe=20 in talking the talk w/o walking the walk. I hope to come up with at=20 least an idea that will be listened to, and at the least maybe generate=20= some positive discussion. The issue here, for me, is not so much the=20 loss of Matt, but the way it was handled. --Larry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D146278-38A8-11D7-9713-000393A335A2>