Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 14:15:39 +0200 (MET DST) From: Wolfram Schneider <wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) Cc: mpp@freefall.freebsd.org (Mike Pritchard), wosch@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-share@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man9 style.9 Message-ID: <199608231215.OAA22685@caramba.cs.tu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <199608230710.JAA29339@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <199608222027.NAA14699@freefall.freebsd.org> <199608230710.JAA29339@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
J. Wunsch writes: >As Mike Pritchard wrote: > >> > remove case '?', if '?' is not in getopt(), it should >> > not be in the switch statement > >> '?' is a valid return value from getopt(), and should probably be >> in the switch statement, even if it is covered by the "default" case. >> Since this is the style guide, including it in the example will >> at least make people think about it. > >Yep. Folks, please discuss modifications to the style guide first. There was a discussion 6 months ago. mv.c revision 1.6 date: 1996/02/19 05:51:13; author: pst; state: Exp; lines: +2 -5 [...] -? is an unnecessary case statement and not useful Wolfram
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608231215.OAA22685>