Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 09:49:14 -0800 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Jeremy Lea <reg@shale.csir.co.za> Cc: Nik Clayton <nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysctl descriptions Message-ID: <199901111749.JAA92509@dingo.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 11 Jan 1999 15:05:17 %2B0200." <19990111150517.B3187@shale.csir.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> <WARNING type="wild idea"> > Instead of having /boot, why not have /_KERNEL_? One directory per kernel > config file, named after the config file, and will all of the stuff built > for that kernel. eg: Because 99.9% of the userbase have and want exactly one kernel, and couldn't give a rat's ass about support for more than one. We need to support the concept so that developers don't go ballistic, but it's not something that calls for that sort of mess. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901111749.JAA92509>