Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 11:11:54 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> To: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new arp code snapshot for review... Message-ID: <20040518111153.A46894@xorpc.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <1084898991.23208.14.camel@builder02.qubesoft.com>; from dfr@nlsystems.com on Tue, May 18, 2004 at 05:49:51PM %2B0100 References: <20040425094940.A50968@xorpc.icir.org> <200405162013.33894.dfr@nlsystems.com> <Pine.GSO.4.60.0405181021470.8050@zeus> <20040518014828.B2380@xorpc.icir.org> <1084885227.23208.3.camel@builder02.qubesoft.com> <20040518090647.A39810@xorpc.icir.org> <Pine.GSO.4.60.0405181817030.16008@zeus> <1084898991.23208.14.camel@builder02.qubesoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 05:49:51PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: ... > > The most common use of that table is to have an l3_addr and search the > > ll_addr, right? In that case making ll_addr variable shouldn't have a > > measurable influence on speed. Variable l3_addr could be different though. > > Well it seems to me that IPv6 neighbour discovery is different enough > from ARP that it makes sense to have IPv4-specialised ARP and actually, not too much -- the patch i used already included nd6 code that borrowed a lot from the v4 version. anyways, as i said, i need to think a bit about things before making a decision. cheers luigi > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040518111153.A46894>