Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:43:25 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Devin Teske <devin.teske@fisglobal.com> Cc: 'Devin Teske' <dteske@vicor.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, 'Andriy Gapon' <avg@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option Message-ID: <CBB6C91A-7202-4646-9A3C-B9DCCF6810F7@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <074901ccf7f3$d7ca6160$875f2420$@fisglobal.com> References: <4F26CC5A.2070501@FreeBSD.org> <4F4C0600.2000903@FreeBSD.org> <3BA1B476-ED05-4E8E-8DFA-0B06EFB48867@samsco.org> <201202280846.08966.jhb@freebsd.org> <A8C72CB9-4C77-4697-8C28-63A2E10C557D@fisglobal.com> <4F4F35B9.5090308@FreeBSD.org> <06bb01ccf7cb$b255a200$1700e600$@fisglobal.com> <26352740-D897-46CD-BD17-C61334826524@samsco.org> <4F4FE9E1.4020201@freebsd.org> <074901ccf7f3$d7ca6160$875f2420$@fisglobal.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 1, 2012, at 2:39 PM, Devin Teske wrote: >=20 > I'm interested in which path you would choose amongst what I've seen = mentioned > thus far: >=20 > a. Modifying the boot menu to offer fine-grain control over each = aspect of Safe > Mode (wherein perhaps the Safe Mode option becomes a hook for a = sub-menu rather > than its current setup as an "On"/"Off" toggle). I would favor this. "Safe Mode" (or whatever it gets renamed to) = activates a sub menu with N number of knobs plus an all-on/all-off = option.=20 Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CBB6C91A-7202-4646-9A3C-B9DCCF6810F7>