Date: Thu, 22 May 97 11:53:12 +0200 From: garyj@frt.dec.com To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pure /proc ps? Message-ID: <9705220953.AA31258@cssmuc.frt.dec.com> In-Reply-To: Message from Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> of Wed, 21 May 97 11:05:37 PDT.
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
terry@lambert.org writes: > Personally, I think that 'ps' in the system dump case should be built > into the "crash" proram, not into 'ps', and that 'ps' should use /proc > and that mounting /proc should be as mandatory as I believe mounting > /dev should be. > you have crash working under FreeBSD ? Neat ! Lemme have it ! In case you really mean crash == gdb, I tend to agree. It would be handy to have a ps type command to look at a crash dump. And it shouldn't be too hard to do, really. The basic code is already in kvm-fbsd.c. --- Gary Jennejohn (work) gjennejohn@frt.dec.com (home) Gary.Jennejohn@munich.netsurf.de (play) gj@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9705220953.AA31258>