Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 20:06:19 -0600 From: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@attbi.com> Cc: Wesley Morgan <morganw@chemikals.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GCC 3.2.2 import -- questions Message-ID: <20030210200619.A23718@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030211020303.GA37644@attbi.com>; from rodrigc@attbi.com on Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 09:03:03PM -0500 References: <20030210204245.E86987@volatile.chemikals.org> <20030211020303.GA37644@attbi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* De: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@attbi.com> [ Data: 2003-02-10 ] [ Subjecte: Re: GCC 3.2.2 import -- questions ] > On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 08:44:33PM -0500, Wesley Morgan wrote: > > that are supposedly fixed with 3.2.2... My question is, should I consider > > rebuilding my ports with this new compiler because of stability and/or > > speed improvements? Or is this point release not worth the effort. > > Speed improvements? No. gcc 3.2.2 is definitely slower than gcc 2.95. > There is a lot of arguing on the gcc mailing list right now about this, > but no concrete action to improve the situation yet. I would assume the OP meant relative to the previous version of GCC in tree. Current hasn't been 2.95.x for some time. -- Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> AIM: BSDFlata -- IRC: juli on EFnet OpenDarwin, Mono, FreeBSD Developer ircd-hybrid Developer, EFnet addict FreeBSD on MIPS-Anything on FreeBSD To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030210200619.A23718>