Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:59:06 +0200
From:      Claus Guttesen <kometen@gmail.com>
To:        performance@freebsd.org
Cc:        gnn@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Tarball of ported libmicro 0.3 available for testing...
Message-ID:  <b41c755205080723591b7ffc41@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1123466477.767.2.camel@spirit>
References:  <m2hde3b3k8.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <01F3BA1C-C7C6-41C7-AFE8-675FA972D1A3@FreeBSD.org> <1123466477.767.2.camel@spirit>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > I plan to make a  port of this this weekend, but would like some
> > > feedback on this set of benchmarks.  If they're useful I think we
> > > should make them part of a nightly benchmarking strategy.
> >

I ran them on my dual Xeon @ 2.4 GHz, but it appears that rather than
doing it's calculations in a timely manner it's been inspired by the
world championship in athletics in Helsingfors. It's been longjumping
since last night:

last pid: 20440;  load averages:  1.09,  1.13,  1.09                 =20
                                           up 12+21:24:00  08:57:17
140 processes: 2 running, 138 sleeping
CPU states: 19.1% user,  0.0% nice, 33.5% system,  0.0% interrupt, 47.4% id=
le
Mem: 463M Active, 1213M Inact, 220M Wired, 104M Cache, 112M Buf, 7320K Free
Swap: 4096M Total, 992K Used, 4095M Free

  PID USERNAME  THR PRI NICE   SIZE    RES STATE  C   TIME   WCPU COMMAND
18858 claus       1 115    0  2368K  1056K CPU1   1 631:52 99.02% longjmp
57798 claus       1  96    0   150M   148M select 0  48:48  0.54% Xorg

Did a gmake and started the benchmark without any parameters.

Nice work moving it to FreeBSD.

regards
Claus



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b41c755205080723591b7ffc41>