Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 4 May 1999 11:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        Tony Finch <fanf@demon.net>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: NFS Patch #8 for current available - new TCP fixes
Message-ID:  <199905041827.LAA14894@apollo.backplane.com>
References:   <E10efU7-0004Iv-00@fanf.noc.demon.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

:>    remainder of the packet - the ip payload - to NOT be 4-byte aligned.
:
:We're planning to try replacing some Solaris web servers with FreeBSD
:machines in the near future. The documents are on a read-only NFS
:filestore connected to the web servers with CDDI. (Updates will stay
:on a Sun box.) Are we going to have nfs_realign problems if we use TCP
:in this situation or should we stick with UDP?
:
:Tony.

    TCP should be very close to UDP now on current.  I hope to get a patch
    for the TCP fixes into -stable for the 3.2 release.  There are still bugs
    in NFS, but they are considerably less serious then before.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199905041827.LAA14894>