Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 21:56:37 -0500 From: Paul Kraus <paul@kraus-haus.org> To: David Powers via freebsd-virtualization <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: The status of docker Message-ID: <4E30C2DA-0CF1-48EF-B1BD-379E5C02D8C8@kraus-haus.org> In-Reply-To: <FE466DD8-8FF9-43B4-8D5E-1AF8FEEE798F@punkt.de> References: <089e330d-2761-2440-3b7f-dd22e9088af5@gjunka.com> <9A01020A-7CC6-4893-A425-11A7BF736F4E@ultra-secure.de> <42f59b63-fdc7-306f-d836-83533741a86c@FreeBSD.org> <CAG=rPVfTZnYc6%2BDjtk0SjkqijJQh6uA1G9VWEBsYy4aDYvYEgQ@mail.gmail.com> <CC0F6FB5-7939-4586-86DD-B5548E0043C3@punkt.de> <5c926314-adce-dba1-f5ce-2fda35e1aeba@gjunka.com> <FDDC8A58-8AD3-4D07-B0B3-0BDFA214ABA0@punkt.de> <7A86028D-C413-4063-84D8-5AB985EAD2A0@kraus-haus.org> <FE466DD8-8FF9-43B4-8D5E-1AF8FEEE798F@punkt.de>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Jan 28, 2019, at 2:40 AM, Patrick M. Hausen <hausen@punkt.de> wrote: > > Good morning, > >> Am 28.01.2019 um 03:53 schrieb Paul Kraus <paul@kraus-haus.org>: >> (Open)Solaris already had Linux Brand zones, which I’m sure helped get there much faster. >> They could already run Linux (user space) in a Zone. > > Yes, but how did they get there? Is there some technical reason > why Linux branded zones are „so far ahead“ of FreeBSD’s Linux > ABI that they can run native Docker images while FreeBSD can’t? > > Or is it just a matter of money and manpower invested? May be. Solaris introduced Containers and Zones in Solaris 10 and over the life of Solaris 10 added new features. I suspect Linux Branded Zones was developed along side Solaris Branded Zones (which let you run a different version of Solaris in a Zone), but Sun was paying for the development effort. All that was over 10 years ago now and the memory is not as clear as it was then. Joyent also pays people to develop Illumos / SmartOS.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E30C2DA-0CF1-48EF-B1BD-379E5C02D8C8>