Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 09:20:45 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Brian Somers <brian@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/periodic/weekly 400.status-pkg Message-ID: <20010325092045.A24469@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <200103251135.f2PBZN690547@freefall.freebsd.org>; from brian@FreeBSD.ORG on Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 03:35:23AM -0800 References: <200103251135.f2PBZN690547@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 03:35:23AM -0800, Brian Somers wrote: > brian 2001/03/25 03:35:23 PST > > Modified files: > etc/periodic/weekly 400.status-pkg > Log: > Identify obsolete ports > Is this really a good idea? I have 29 ports that are considered obsolete on my system. One of those 29 is png-1.0.8. If I blindly update png, do I then need to update all the ports that depend on png: root[18] pkg_info -R png-1.0.8 Information for png-1.0.8: Required by: gd-1.8.3 gnuplot-3.7.1 ghostscript-6.01 teTeX-1.0.7 xpaint-2.5.7 netpbm-9.7 transfig-3.2.3 xfig-3.2.3c knews-1.0b.1 ImageMagick-5.2.3 -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010325092045.A24469>