Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 11:17:25 -0800 From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kostik Belousov <kib@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 9-STABLE -> NFS -> NetAPP: Message-ID: <66254EB1-3E15-4DBF-AFA6-FFB9AC7701DB@hub.org> In-Reply-To: <1422247357.3019523.1360860105806.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> References: <1422247357.3019523.1360860105806.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2013-02-14, at 08:41 , Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>=20
> Btw Marc, if you just want this problem to go away, I suspect getting =
rid
> of the "intr" mount option would do that.
Am more interested in fixing the problem (if possible) then just masking =
it, but ...
Based on the man page for mount_nfs, wouldn't that have the opposite =
effect:
intr Make the mount interruptible, which implies that =
file
system calls that are delayed due to an =
unresponsive
server will fail with EINTR when a termination =
signal is
posted for the process.
I may be mis-reading, but from the above it sounds like a -9 *should* =
terminate the process if intr is enabled, while with it disabled, it =
would ignore it =85 ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?66254EB1-3E15-4DBF-AFA6-FFB9AC7701DB>