Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 3 Apr 2014 08:05:48 +0100
From:      David Chisnall <theraven@theravensnest.org>
To:        Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: WDS with a FreeBSD access point
Message-ID:  <DDD043B9-1002-4E80-B687-11B8718A875C@theravensnest.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=P50h6q1b0%2BTgFD%2Bh%2BhPfG7UiNd0vpPmO%2B5k374YOPSA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <E8950480-2829-4F4E-A48C-B080AE75BC97@FreeBSD.org> <533BD60D.9050701@weboutsourcing.cz> <CAJ-Vmokx1Ce7yQ=VGeqT4FnSgtG3JZMJs2bvs4vdbaYYDyZ0kw@mail.gmail.com> <533CD386.80906@weboutsourcing.cz> <E7DD4EF0-1A2F-4237-8995-F1D0AC1ABA87@theravensnest.org> <CAJ-Vmo=P50h6q1b0%2BTgFD%2Bh%2BhPfG7UiNd0vpPmO%2B5k374YOPSA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3 Apr 2014, at 07:57, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:

> Are both freebsd APs?

Nope, the main station is a FreeBSD box, the remote is a cheap commodity =
AP (there are a lot that claim to do WDS for under =A310 - I have two =
different models for testing).

> It looks reasonably straightfoward. I really should just give this a
> go at home on an extender AP and test the hell out of it.

Let me know how it goes...

> So, for wifi traffic, you absolutely want the wifi VAPs in a bridge
> group as the traffic between stations and APs is all layer-2.

I think I'm missing something here.  The script created a bridge between =
the wireless and wired interfaces.  I don't think I want that, so what =
do I want the bridge between?

> There's
> no routing involved. If you want to route between the bridge0
> interface and the rest of the system then please do so but do put the
> STA and AP VAPs into the same bridge group.

'STA and AP VAPs'?  Can we go back to assuming that I don't know =
anything please?

David




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DDD043B9-1002-4E80-B687-11B8718A875C>