Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 22:21:38 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk sys.mk Message-ID: <200102210521.f1L5Lds04947@billy-club.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:31:17 %2B1100." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102211415050.25100-100000@besplex.bde.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102211415050.25100-100000@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102211415050.25100-100000@besplex.bde.org> Bruce Evans writes:
: I have changed my mind a bit about this. MACHINE_CPU is not (yet?) nearly
: as fundamental as the other MACHINE_* variables. It is currently just
: a build option for libcrypto, so it could be handled like other build
: options.
So are you saying we should just toss a MACHINE_CPU ?= ${MACHINE_ARCH}
in /etc/defaults/make.conf and be done with it. If we did this, with
a sys.mk transition period, we'd solve the long term problem of too
many things in sys.mk while still allowing for this to move forward.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102210521.f1L5Lds04947>