Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 16:58:40 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru> To: Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD-CURRENT ML <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Leaving the Desktop Market Message-ID: <20140403095840.GA79573@regency.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BD9QhuN2o2YTSFoeL=gt_11XpZqW7qwhBQ8XnhOQ0XF3pDv-w@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAF6rxgkeBozvfV-L0%2BrFZ6fWRn0=Gi3BNq1kPL=-HTq0TD6MkQ@mail.gmail.com> <082a01cf4db9$240d3e90$6c27bbb0$@FreeBSD.org> <201404012240.s31MeIe4073267@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <20140403014419.GA45830@regency.nsu.ru> <CA%2BD9QhuPFH0LXSQzm1x8Xs=ZfBCc8EoO%2BVcVRZ%2BapP%2Bo3a9Ejw@mail.gmail.com> <20140403075824.GA50437@regency.nsu.ru> <CA%2BD9QhuN2o2YTSFoeL=gt_11XpZqW7qwhBQ8XnhOQ0XF3pDv-w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 11:21:34AM +0200, Matthias Gamsjager wrote: > > Since when is GIMP an alternative to Lightroom? I was talking about > > raw processors, not raster image manipulators. > > The opensource alternatives to Lightroom come not close to the original. They maybe not yet a drop-in replacement, but they are competitive enough to be discussed on photo forums (read: outside open source geeky cabal): http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/32-digital-processing-software-printing/242584-darktable-vs-lightroom.html http://photo.stackexchange.com/questions/37238/how-does-darktable-compare-to-adobe-lightroom-for-editing-jpegs http://photo.stackexchange.com/questions/23272/simple-comparison-of-lightroom-4-corel-aftershot-pro-darktable http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/39475179 As they say, "The differences in actual editing are negligible. It's not even worth migrating between the two. LR comes with a price-tag, Darktable comes with bugs." ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140403095840.GA79573>