Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 Apr 1998 14:24:36 -0400 (EDT)
From:      "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net>
To:        Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Cc:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, Harlan Stenn <Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: bin/6353 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.980422142400.523z-100000@sasami.jurai.net>
In-Reply-To: <199804221423.KAA01392@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 22 Apr 1998, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> Strongly disagree.  Every NFS system out there comes with an
> automounter of some sort or another.  Most of them come with Sun's
> broken automount(8), for which the source is thankfully unavailable.
> amd is an important, fundamental part of an NFS implementation (and
> one which we may need to hack at times in order to reflect changes in
> our kernel code).

It looks like am-utils and amd are the same thing, a few years removed
from eachother.  I don't see what the problem is.

/* 
   Matthew N. Dodd		| A memory retaining a love you had for life	
   winter@jurai.net		| As cruel as it seems nothing ever seems to
   http://www.jurai.net/~winter | go right - FLA M 3.1:53	
*/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980422142400.523z-100000>