Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 12:59:47 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable? Message-ID: <20050608165947.GB79586@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <42A71AE1.8020300@incubus.de> References: <20050608001306.3FB1F43D5C@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <42A6C7CE.9000002@incubus.de> <200506080908.02478.fcash@ocis.net> <42A71AE1.8020300@incubus.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--DBIVS5p969aUjpLe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 06:20:49PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote: > Freddie Cash wrote: >=20 > > The only problem we've had with FreeBSD 5 is one system running 5.2.1 t= hat=20 > > ran for over a year just fine, but would not complete a buildworld=20 > > (hardware has died and it has been retired, so it's not an issue any=20 > > more). >=20 > I remember 5.2.1 panicking left and right, on several machines, it was > completely unusable. Maybe we just live in different universes. Right, it was a developer preview release that was not intended for production use. Kris --DBIVS5p969aUjpLe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCpyQDWry0BWjoQKURAnf7AKDJcPvwMeNAZnnL03rKIWQ+Dx2kzACeIPAb syLQ2YjyDna9JyZsA3CpsWc= =/pz9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DBIVS5p969aUjpLe--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050608165947.GB79586>