Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 15:44:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libfetch http.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007171543030.71982-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <xzpvgy4wfcr.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18 Jul 2000, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > Given the number of bugfixes going into fetch and libfetch, I have to
> > wonder whether the MFC was premature - don't forget the code freeze is in
> > 3 days.
>
> I discussed this with Jordan before committing, and he told me to go
> ahead and MFC (the alternative, BTW, was not leaving the code as is,
> but backing it out and reverting to the old fetch(1) until some time
> after the release)
Yes :-)
I have heard quite a few bug reports with the new fetch..have you fixed
all the ones you know of, and does the new one support all of the
features of the old?
Kris
--
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0007171543030.71982-100000>