Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:45:23 +0900 (JST) From: chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp (Nakata Maho) To: marius@alchemy.franken.de Cc: maho@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, alexander@leidinger.net Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/ifc Makefile pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/lang/ifc/files assert_fail.c cpio-exclude cxa_atexit.c cxa_finalize.c errno_location.c ld.c linux_file.c mcount.S patch-aa patch-ifc stderr.c sysconf.c Message-ID: <20021118.224523.640912260.maho@scarlatti.synchem.kyoto-u.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <20021118115407.GQ89667@newtrinity.zeist.de> References: <200211180927.gAI9RWOa074354@repoman.freebsd.org> <20021118115407.GQ89667@newtrinity.zeist.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> the freebsd-ports of icc and ifc still cannot coexist as both ports patch > the libraries in different ways but install them to the same location, > i.e. overwrite each others' libraries. therefore please revert the backout > of the check for icc in the ifc-port. I read through codes(but not deeply concerned), and I think simply install icc over ifc is ok, but ifc over icc won't be good. Well, extensive test should be done for both compiler... At least `ld' is the superset of icc version. In some way they can be unified. -- Nakata Maho To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021118.224523.640912260.maho>