Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:27:57 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Marc UBM Bocklet <ubm@u-boot-man.de> Subject: Re: minor annoyance with usb transition (or pilot error) Message-ID: <200904191527.58168.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: <20090419134204.57ad25a7.ubm@u-boot-man.de> References: <20090419134204.57ad25a7.ubm@u-boot-man.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 19 April 2009, Marc UBM Bocklet wrote: > Hiho! :-) > > I'm in the process of upgrading to the latest -current (I'm currently > running -current as of 02. Jan. 2009). > > I was using the new usb stack with the 02. Jan. -current and > consequently had to change my kernel config back to the old usb naming > scheme (after changing to the temporary new usb naming scheme in > January). > > While doing this, "device ugen" caused my kernconf to fail, I > had to comment it out. Including "device udbp" makes buildkernel fail > (I can reproduce this and post the error, but I believe this is known). Did you include Netgraph options before including udbp ? The udbp module builds ? > I was wondering if UPDATING should mention that device ugen is no > longer needed (if thats the case), else people using their old kernel > config will have it fail until they comment "device ugen" out. --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200904191527.58168.hselasky>