Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 16:52:11 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> Cc: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams), Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>, mmuir@es.co.nz, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: followup to apm problems. Message-ID: <199909012252.QAA20666@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 01 Sep 1999 15:45:00 PDT." <199909012245.PAA01429@dingo.cdrom.com> References: <199909012245.PAA01429@dingo.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199909012245.PAA01429@dingo.cdrom.com> Mike Smith writes: : It's reasonable to assume this, yes. However it's also worth bearing : in mind that since the BIOS isn't using these interrupts to _detect_ : activity, turning them off is pretty pointless. Then why does the key up event cause the suspend to fail? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199909012252.QAA20666>