Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 13:06:34 -0700 From: "Robert L Sowders" <rsowders@usgs.gov> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hard lockups since cvsup'ing Jul 1st. Help! Message-ID: <OF36D6966C.35012FA8-ON88256A7E.006D21FD@wr.usgs.gov>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
Sent by: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
07/03/2001 08:46 AM
=20
To: stable@freebsd.org
cc: rsowders@usgs.gov
Subject: Re: Hard lockups since cvsup'ing Jul 1st. Help!
In article <OF9C18FD6E.59995745-ON88256A7E.00235244@wr.usgs.gov>,
Robert L Sowders <rsowders@usgs.gov> wrote:
> I took a look at the cvsweb and=20
> noticed that mfs=5Fvfsops.c was marked as removed at version 1.93 4 weeks=
=20
> ago by phk,
>>It was removed in -current, but not in -stable. A file in CVS can
>>exist in some branches but not in others.
> but two weeks ago version 181 was added and updated by 1.82=20
> but the dates are backwards on the versions. Screwy eh?
>>That is not what I see when I look at cvsweb or use "cvs log".
> There was a commit to the mfs=5Fvfsops.c file done on Jun 17, that may=20
have=20
> been kinda screwy, or maybe it's just the cvs system.
>>That commit was on the RELENG=5F4 branch (-stable), where the file is
>>still alive. Nothing screwy there.
Ah, that would be my bleary eyes at 3 AM. Didn't realize the branch=20
point.
> version 1.81 is marked as occuring on Jun 17, 2001 and version 1.82
> occurred at Apr 15 2000.
>>I don't know where you saw that. CVSWeb shows a date of Dec 19,
>>1999 for revision 1.81 and Apr 15, 2000 for revision 1.82. That
>>agrees with what is recorded in the actual RCS file.
Uh-excuse the shorthand, I meant to say 1.81.2.1, and it is dated Jun 17,=20
2001
> I'm not sure if cvsup uses the date or the version when it's supping
> files,
>>If you are asking for the -stable branch with "tag=3DRELENG=5F4" then
>>CVSup uses the version.
> Checking my srcs locally it appears that indeed my cvsup pulled
> version 1.81.2.1 dated 2001/06/17 which is wrong and does not have
> the add in version 1.82.
>>That is exactly what CVSup should have done. Revision 1.82 is not
>>a part of -stable; it is in -current only. -stable was branched at
>>revision 1.81, before revision 1.82 was created. For -stable, the
>>revision after 1.81 is 1.81.2.1. Next will come 1.81.2.2, etc.
And that's exactly what happened 24 minutes and 12 seconds ago. Now it's=20
clear. As you are. My eyes like sails, unfurled they are.
> I wonder how many other things are screwy in the cvs repository?
>>I don't see anything screwy there. :-)
>>John
Apparently the only thing screwy in the cvs repository, was me at 3am. ;-) =
--=20
John Polstra jdp@polstra.com
John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington=20
USA
"Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Ch=F6gyam=20
Trungpa
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?OF36D6966C.35012FA8-ON88256A7E.006D21FD>