Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 13:06:34 -0700 From: "Robert L Sowders" <rsowders@usgs.gov> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hard lockups since cvsup'ing Jul 1st. Help! Message-ID: <OF36D6966C.35012FA8-ON88256A7E.006D21FD@wr.usgs.gov>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
Sent by: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
07/03/2001 08:46 AM
To: stable@freebsd.org
cc: rsowders@usgs.gov
Subject: Re: Hard lockups since cvsup'ing Jul 1st. Help!
In article <OF9C18FD6E.59995745-ON88256A7E.00235244@wr.usgs.gov>,
Robert L Sowders <rsowders@usgs.gov> wrote:
> I took a look at the cvsweb and
> noticed that mfs_vfsops.c was marked as removed at version 1.93 4 weeks
> ago by phk,
>>It was removed in -current, but not in -stable. A file in CVS can
>>exist in some branches but not in others.
> but two weeks ago version 181 was added and updated by 1.82
> but the dates are backwards on the versions. Screwy eh?
>>That is not what I see when I look at cvsweb or use "cvs log".
> There was a commit to the mfs_vfsops.c file done on Jun 17, that may
have
> been kinda screwy, or maybe it's just the cvs system.
>>That commit was on the RELENG_4 branch (-stable), where the file is
>>still alive. Nothing screwy there.
Ah, that would be my bleary eyes at 3 AM. Didn't realize the branch
point.
> version 1.81 is marked as occuring on Jun 17, 2001 and version 1.82
> occurred at Apr 15 2000.
>>I don't know where you saw that. CVSWeb shows a date of Dec 19,
>>1999 for revision 1.81 and Apr 15, 2000 for revision 1.82. That
>>agrees with what is recorded in the actual RCS file.
Uh-excuse the shorthand, I meant to say 1.81.2.1, and it is dated Jun 17,
2001
> I'm not sure if cvsup uses the date or the version when it's supping
> files,
>>If you are asking for the -stable branch with "tag=RELENG_4" then
>>CVSup uses the version.
> Checking my srcs locally it appears that indeed my cvsup pulled
> version 1.81.2.1 dated 2001/06/17 which is wrong and does not have
> the add in version 1.82.
>>That is exactly what CVSup should have done. Revision 1.82 is not
>>a part of -stable; it is in -current only. -stable was branched at
>>revision 1.81, before revision 1.82 was created. For -stable, the
>>revision after 1.81 is 1.81.2.1. Next will come 1.81.2.2, etc.
And that's exactly what happened 24 minutes and 12 seconds ago. Now it's
clear. As you are. My eyes like sails, unfurled they are.
> I wonder how many other things are screwy in the cvs repository?
>>I don't see anything screwy there. :-)
>>John
Apparently the only thing screwy in the cvs repository, was me at 3am. ;-)
--
John Polstra jdp@polstra.com
John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington
USA
"Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam
Trungpa
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?OF36D6966C.35012FA8-ON88256A7E.006D21FD>