Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 20:48:24 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> Cc: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, Harlan Stenn <Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/6353 Message-ID: <4382.893270904@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 22 Apr 1998 14:24:36 EDT." <Pine.BSF.3.96.980422142400.523z-100000@sasami.jurai.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.3.96.980422142400.523z-100000@sasami.jurai.net>, "Matthew N. Dodd" writes: >On Wed, 22 Apr 1998, Garrett Wollman wrote: >> Strongly disagree. Every NFS system out there comes with an >> automounter of some sort or another. Most of them come with Sun's >> broken automount(8), for which the source is thankfully unavailable. >> amd is an important, fundamental part of an NFS implementation (and >> one which we may need to hack at times in order to reflect changes in >> our kernel code). > >It looks like am-utils and amd are the same thing, a few years removed >from eachother. I don't see what the problem is. The question is, should it be a port or should it be contrib ? I guess we should leave this to whoever submits either of these first :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." "Drink MONO-tonic, it goes down but it will NEVER come back up!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4382.893270904>