Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 5 Apr 2014 15:28:55 +0900
From:      Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: What's up with the swapping since 10/stable
Message-ID:  <20140405152855.1cfcf37c87bdff3306d0cd6c@dec.sakura.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To: <CA%2BD9Qhvr%2Bny80J1zSxPNC_bH1gtvJAOxkfmLXxuiFZsRVyXQ3Q@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CA%2BD9QhvDsTwosUxUeL2U05dMt%2BKe6kY5BYCNjJo8e8TsfZTsXg@mail.gmail.com> <A4BE503B-ADA9-4F61-893E-79A5F30728A2@bridgenet.se> <533DB9B1.3070500@denninger.net> <CA%2BD9Qhvr%2Bny80J1zSxPNC_bH1gtvJAOxkfmLXxuiFZsRVyXQ3Q@mail.gmail.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

Yes, Karl's patch fixed my swap regression, too.
ZFS-root notebook with 8GB RAM, stable/10 amd64.

No swap usage is observed after applying his patch, feeling (but not
measured) no performance penalty.

But unfortunately, the patch haven't been merged even to head.
So, anyone chasing vanilla head or stable/10 has no fix yet.


On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 09:24:52 +0200
Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com> wrote:

> This was an old post and after few week Karl came up with an arc patch
> which fixed this issue.


-- 
Tomoaki AOKI    junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140405152855.1cfcf37c87bdff3306d0cd6c>