Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 08:44:18 +0000 From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> To: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>, Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: rand() is broken Message-ID: <200302030844.aa84195@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 02 Feb 2003 16:02:27 PST." <20030202160227.B62390@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > FWIW - AIX aggrees with Solaris.
> Endiannes, or an SVR4 implementation difference?
OS X agrees with FreeBSD i386. In fact, FreeBSD sparc64 and FreeBSD
alpha are all the same too, so it seems the code isn't too sensitive
to byteorder or wordsize.
Bakul's comments on who agrees with BSD 4.{2,3,4}-* probably explain
the differences.
David.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200302030844.aa84195>