Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:53:01 +0200
From:      Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>
Cc:        pgollucci@FreeBSD.org, apache@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: AP_FAST_BUILD problems
Message-ID:  <1277412781.8151.0.camel@hood.oook.cz>
In-Reply-To: <4C23AFE6.9080604@p6m7g8.com>
References:  <4C235CE4.3060800@FreeBSD.org>  <4C23AFE6.9080604@p6m7g8.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

[-- Attachment #1 --]
Philip M. Gollucci píše v čt 24. 06. 2010 v 19:20 +0000:

> > your recent sweep to convert mod_* ports to AP_FAST_BUILD can lead to
> > hard to detect runtime problems, when the module consists from more than
> > one .c file.  We just hit tis on mod_layout22 here at my job.
> > 
> > You might want to do a pass over all ports you changed, and revert when
> > needed.
> > 
> I don't disagree, but you'll have to give me more info for why.  The
> whole point of apxs is that it can handle or or more .c files.  The
> specific error you see in layout22 would be of much use.

The specific issue with layout22 was that ports framework only compiled
one .c file with apxs (mod_layout.c) which then failed on apache startup
due to missing symbols which would normally come from utility.c

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
              <pav@FreeBSD.org>
Alignment: Neutral Greedy

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD)

iEYEABECAAYFAkwjxakACgkQntdYP8FOsoKb6wCfeV0nuojNNb0L7xQ3zA5cDy8Z
puIAn1GVSlYNtxt2X4WgRY7F/+MwcdcN
=AR6x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1277412781.8151.0.camel>