Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 09:14:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie> Cc: FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: KSE status report Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207020912391.95531-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <200207021106.aa15257@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Good idea. Unforunatly someone tried to complie a libc_r with the old queue.h and it had the same problem (or so they said). On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Ian Dowse wrote: > In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207020054590.94626-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>, Ju > lian Elischer writes: > >The big problem at the moment is that something in the > >source tree as a whole, and probably something that came in with KSE > >is stopping us from successfully compiling a working libc_r. > >(a bit ironic really). > > Is the new > > (elm)->field.tqe_next = (void *)-1; > > in TAILQ_REMOVE a likely candidate? That could easily tickle old > bugs in other code. The libc_r code does use a lot of TAILQ macros. > > Ian > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0207020912391.95531-100000>