Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 6 May 2010 22:47:00 -1000 (HST)
From:      Jeff Roberson <jroberson@jroberson.net>
To:        Fabien Thomas <fabien.thomas@netasq.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SUJ deadlock
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1005062246100.1398@desktop>
In-Reply-To: <70EFD2C3-9EA3-43D0-A1CE-9FC7FA49C50A@netasq.com>
References:  <B9090D36-D0E7-48D9-9FE2-FD0C7A486AC3@netasq.com> <4BDF2A4D.3030706@gmail.com> <C5565B6E-11C7-46C1-97A1-81AE1D5A7C78@netasq.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1005051253480.1398@desktop> <493FBE07-D745-4DDE-B7EE-C41F626B1597@netasq.com> <70EFD2C3-9EA3-43D0-A1CE-9FC7FA49C50A@netasq.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 7 May 2010, Fabien Thomas wrote:

> fixed/works a lot better for me.

Thanks Fabien,  I just committed this.

Thanks everyone for the assistance finding bugs so far.  Please let me 
know if you run into anything else.  For now I don't know of any other 
than some feature/change requests for tunefs.

Thanks,
Jeff

>
>> Applied and restarted portupgrade.
>> Will tell you tomorrow.
>>
>> Fabien
>>
>> Le 6 mai 2010 ? 00:54, Jeff Roberson a ?crit :
>>
>>> On Mon, 3 May 2010, Fabien Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Hi Jeff,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm with r207548 now and since some days i've system deadlock.
>>>>>> It seems related to SUJ with process waiting on suspfs or ppwait.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've also seen it stalled in suspfs, but this information is way better
>>>>> than what I was able to garner.   I was only able to tell via ctrl-t on
>>>>> a stalled 'ls' process in a terminal before hard booting.
>>>>>
>>>>> Right now it occurs everytime I attempt to do the portmaster -a upgrade
>>>>> of X/KDE on this system.
>>>>
>>>> I've spotted this during multiple portupgrade -aR :)
>>>
>>> Can anyone who has experienced this hang test this patch:
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>> Index: ffs_softdep.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- ffs_softdep.c       (revision 207480)
>>> +++ ffs_softdep.c       (working copy)
>>> @@ -9301,7 +9301,7 @@
>>>                       hadchanges = 1;
>>>       }
>>>       /* Leave this inodeblock dirty until it's in the list. */
>>> -       if ((inodedep->id_state & (UNLINKED | DEPCOMPLETE)) == UNLINKED)
>>> +       if ((inodedep->id_state & (UNLINKED | UNLINKONLIST)) == UNLINKED)
>>>               hadchanges = 1;
>>>       /*
>>>        * If we had to rollback the inode allocation because of
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Fabien
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1005062246100.1398>