Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:40:22 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Tim Robbins <tjr@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Somethings still up with new NSS? Message-ID: <xzp8ytts461.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20030428111859.GA2923@madman.celabo.org> ("Jacques A. Vidrine"'s message of "Mon, 28 Apr 2003 06:18:59 -0500") References: <20030428075916.GA53857@myhakas.internal> <20030428190209.A21656@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20030428075916.GA53857@myhakas.internal> <20030428080505.GA1474@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw> <20030428075916.GA53857@myhakas.internal> <20030428105521.GB2676@madman.celabo.org> <20030428111859.GA2923@madman.celabo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> writes: > But, if you run `pwd_mkdb -u' BEFORE you rebuild the entire database > with plain `pwd_mkdb', the database will have version 3 entries for > all of your users, but only a version 4 entry for the single target > user. Old binaries still function fine, but new binaries now `see' > that the database supports the new version 4 entries. So, only the > single user that was updated is recognized. Why do new binaries ignore the older version 3 entries? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp8ytts461.fsf>