Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 4 Feb 2014 17:09:57 -0500
From:      Garrett Wollman <wollman@csail.mit.edu>
To:        "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org, scottl@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Heap overflow in mps(4) (was: Re: stable/9 mps(4) rev 254938 == BOOM!)
Message-ID:  <21233.25909.355102.743155@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20140131003342.GA11755@nargothrond.kdm.org>
References:  <21225.19508.683025.581620@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu> <201401292137.s0TLbD5G006716@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <20140129221514.GA47535@nargothrond.kdm.org> <21225.38749.179621.454579@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu> <20140131003342.GA11755@nargothrond.kdm.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:33:42 -0700, "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@freebsd.org> said:

> The fact that the redzone code doesn't expose any problems makes it more
> likely that it is a problem other than a heap overflow.

So I built a new kernel with DEBUG_MEMGUARD.  When
vm.memguard.desc="mps", everything works fine both through two
load/unload cycles and statically compiled into the kernel.  When
vm.memguard.desc is not set, instapanic as before.  (I'm trying
memguard rather than redzone as it has much less of a performance
impact, so I can start doing some of the performance testing I was
originally intending to do.

Are there any debugging options that I could usefully enable that
would show just what mps is doing when the fault happens?  I see that
there are lots of tracing options but I don't know what would actually
be useful.

-GAWollman



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?21233.25909.355102.743155>