Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:20:59 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@freebsd.org> To: Krishna Mohan Gundu <gkmohan@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wep key index in examples of section 29.3 in handbook Message-ID: <20080811122059.GD1022@gothic.blackend.org> In-Reply-To: <70ec82800808110505r4b2840c7tfab4ff456e890653@mail.gmail.com> References: <70ec82800808110235g293bd777i647e13873d640f35@mail.gmail.com> <20080811103525.GA1022@gothic.blackend.org> <70ec82800808110505r4b2840c7tfab4ff456e890653@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 05:05:01AM -0700, Krishna Mohan Gundu wrote: > Hi Marc, > [...] > I did read this note. My wireless router configuration has no mention > of different keys. It simply takes a key for encryption. So I was > immediately thrown off this key business. Third key did not make any > sense to me. The fact that some access points have provision for only > one key is not clear from any documentation. Probably it helps here if > a note like this is added > > "Some access points take only one key, in which case use 1 for key index" > Ok, I see. What do you think about something like: "Note: If you do not have any idea of what is the key used by your access point, you should try to use 1 for both of the key and the index." -- Marc
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080811122059.GD1022>