Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 01 Feb 2009 11:27:56 -0700 (MST)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        hselasky@c2i.net
Cc:        freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org, thompsa@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: USB2 patches
Message-ID:  <20090201.112756.1320088159.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <200902011922.16810.hselasky@c2i.net>
References:  <200902011220.18745.hselasky@c2i.net> <20090201175021.GA32503@citylink.fud.org.nz> <200902011922.16810.hselasky@c2i.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <200902011922.16810.hselasky@c2i.net>
            Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> writes:
: In your patch you remove all error checking! If the taskqueue system does not 
: have an API function that can tell if the taskqueue is being drained from 
: inside the taskqueue callback, the taskqueue system has to be modified! It 
: cannot replace the existing system like it is now!

Why does the taskqueue system need to provide that?  Why can't the
driver set a dying flag in the softc to communicate this fact to the
taskqueue tasks?

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090201.112756.1320088159.imp>